Imitation the sincerest form of flattery
Monday October 1st 2007
by Paul Armstrong
I've had far too many discussions in life over originality, plagiarism and the cost of creative endeavors with friends and colleagues and complete strangers. The internet has brought about a new means of passing blame -- of not only finding things that are similar, but also finding things that are legitimately copied (stolen). The realm of "inspired" ideas, that's a whole other topic. So, here's what I found this morning. I went to my Flickr page and found a nice, though cryptic comment on a photo. I searched his stream to attempt to decipher, found some very nice images -- lots of activity and comments and views (a very popular Flickr-er).
I found this (and compare it to something that looks somewhat familiar):
I took mine in March; his came in August. He commented on one of my photos, which (to me) means he's not oblivious to my photos and who I am (or pretend to be). I feel somewhat ripped off. But at the same time, I can't know that he's intentionally "borrowed" an idea, or was inspired by my idea; but there's certainly an uncanny similarity (or am I wrong?). Would you call this uncooth? Unethical? Wrong? Or just inspiration? Am I just being bitter?
Comments are turned off for "Imitation the sincerest form of flattery"




Comments for "Imitation the sincerest form of flattery"
Refresh this page
Hmmmm...very interesting similarity.
by Trent
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
People always amaze me. Its crazy how when it comes to intellectual property (i.e. the idea for your composistion) people have no regard and are willing to steal ideas in a heartbeat. This is a total ripoff and is very frustrating to see. I wonder how many more people are farming your ideas.
by Paragone
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
well, what can you do... I would be proud -- you've inspired someone by creating something that nobody has (probably) created before. did he properly credited your name on his flickr photo-stream?
by Peter
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
@Peter: No, that's my main beef. He actually Flickr mailed me back acknowledging that I was the inspiration for the photo (duh), but he didn't credit me (though I'm guessing he will -- I'm attempting to be kind with some pressure to give credit where credit is due).
by Paul
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
Can you ask that he removes the goo from his eye?
by Renaud
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
I don't know, Paul, "inspiration" is one thing, downright stealing is another, all the way down to the unshaven face. Sorry, buddy.
by Jason Windsor
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
that'd bug the life outta me. So wrong!
by christine Gill
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
ps.
Yours is way better. A lot more emotion there for a start.
: )
by christine Gill
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
i see he's added "inspired by wiseacre"... was that not there before?
by christine Gill
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
That was not there before ... so he heeded my warnings -- GOOD.
by Paul
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
i like yours better- as is typical- the original is better.
by missi
∞ Monday, October 1st, 2007
wowza. that's pretty blatant. i agree with windsor 100%. i can be inspired by any artist in the world. but when i am i usually take small pieces of the inspiration and hammer it into what i already have stirring in my mind. like i've done paintings before that have very Robert Motherwell-esque backgrounds, but never go full out to copy it 100%.
this guy was not inspired, he TRACED your drawing. pure and simple.
my legions have been dispatched. as always, you will recieve an annonymous phone call in a few days simply stating "the jackal says you don't have to do the laundry this week". you will know what this means.
by general lee
∞ Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007
you know my angle. enough said.
by Luke
∞ Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007
Total rip job.. hands down.
by Michael
∞ Friday, October 5th, 2007