Watchmen: The Movie (A Review)
Monday March 2nd 2009
by Paul Armstrong

Having only finished the Watchmen graphic novel hours before getting to see a special preview screening of the film its contents sat heavy in stomach like a loaded burrito, undigested. I didn't have two decades to process, rehash and internalize the novel as apart of my own internal literary consciousness, so I hope I can offer a more unbiased view of the overall film.
I had no history with the Watchmen graphic novel, with nothing personally at stake in my own perception of what the movie should be. I came to the film fairly uninfluenced about how or what it should be, but knowing enough to follow the story, its deviations and additions. Any purist will be disappointed and any novice might feel completely lost. Every novel, or graphic novel must make decisions with what not to show, while attempting to remain true to the intent of the story and keeping a consistent flow for the screen. i believe the film version Watchmen accomplished that. Without giving much away in terms of what is or is not in the film I'll do my best to talk about my impressions.
The film begins much like the novel, though there is scene which nearly straight out of an SNL skit (you'll see what I mean, I had a hard time concentrating on what was happening). The cinematraphy is nearly flawless in matching the novels setting, tone and atmosphere; keeping the little nuiances like photos, wallpaper and televisions. The dark and seedy landscape of the alternate New York feels ominous; and the framing is signature Zach Snyder. I'd wished for more transitions that mirrored the interplay of timelines that novel so adaptly enforces -- though it does happen, it could be stronger.
In order for the film to flow well, the many ancillary storylines that run throughout the novel are either removed or summed up in quick and tidily flashbacks or truncated scenes. The characters feel fairly well developed, though some you'd wish you'd see more of; and others much much less. Their overall storylines remain intact and faithful to the novel. The best character is obviously Rorschach, who is every bit as cold, cruel, tortured and insane as you'd hope -- delivering the best lines of the film (who is played magnificantly, though very close to Christian Bale's Batman; Jackie Earle Haley). Nite Owl/Dan Dreiberg is still the uncertain, bumbling nerd; who is obviously uncomfortable in a world where he cannot wear his mask (played perfectly by Patrick Wilson). Silk Spectre/Laurie Juspeczyk (Malin Akerman) felt emotionally flat, though adequate enough. The Comedian/Edward Morgan Blake (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) was excellent; a jerkface, cynical, rough man who thought of his needs first without an ounce of conscious; and doesn't get nearly the screne time he deserved. Dr. Manhattan/Jonathan Osterman (Billy Crudup - the only "star" in the film, who is unidentifible, save the few flashbacks) is blue -- blue penis, so watch out; blue glowing penis (there's something about his mouth that is too computer generated), but Crudup plays the good Dr. well as an emotionless God-like being. Then there's Ozymandias/Adrian Veidt (Matthew Goode) who feels like something from Flash Gordon (and no, you're wrong! that is not a good thing; unless perhaps Queen does your theme song), and cheeses up the entire ending of the movie.
The soundtrack was widely inconsistent, rotating between classic songs from the 60s and 70s (though never with much point - with the exception of Bob Dylan's The Times They Are A-Changing); the use of All Along the Watchtower during the Vietnam scenes seems very cliched; and the music didn't fit the time peroid. And when there weren't estabished songs, the other music varied between sounding like Blade Runner, Friday Night Lights and The Dark Knight.
Everyone wants to know about the ending and the big change. I personally didn't even like the ending of the novel, or at least that one aspect of it (I found it rather odd, but I suppose in graphic novel lore, its accepted without disbute); I found the new ending logical and fitting for the entire story arc (I preferred this ending to the novel ending, I know - blasphemy, but like I said, I'm not a fanboy).
Overall it was an enjoyable film but very flawed, it felt long in the middle and dragged toward the end, with much more violence and cursing than its counterpart. Sadly it suffers from trying to do much while trying to make you feel like its doing too little. If you're a fan of the novel you ought to enjoy (as long as you keep in mind, no one will ever match the expectations in your head) if you've never read it, I'm curoius as to your perspective (and please share it here).
Official Ciricus Rating: 6/10
Comments are turned off for "Watchmen: The Movie (A Review)"


Comments for "Watchmen: The Movie (A Review)"
Refresh this page
nice review. i bought the book but gave it to a friend to read and i don't think i'll get it back before the show so i'm going in with very little knowledge of the story line. could be interesting from this perspective.
by westerndave
∞ Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009
Great review! I can't wait until it comes out over here!
by andrew.f.
∞ Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009
I've got no background with Watchmen and intentionally kept it that way going into the movie. The movie didn't seem to care that I was unfamiliar with it, it assumes a certain level of competency. That being said after about 30-45 minutes I was able to sort through the confusing flashbacks and quick scenes to get a grasp on the characters.
I enjoyed the cinematography/animation (not sure what to call it) aspect as it was Sin Cityish but it turns out it was just an excuse to pour buckets of blood on screen while people have their heads butchered or arms sawed off.
I agree that language and violence were over the top but so were the sex scenes. For the quantity of time devoted to sex scenes there was very little character development as a result.
I don't know if it was the premise of the book but the ending bothered me in the same way the Dark Knight did. The whole concept was that the general public shouldn't have the truth and that something better than truth can be created for them by people in higher positions...if that wasn't the underlying message of the movie then it must have been some pro-hippie shallow agenda that claims that peace predicated on a lie is just as good as true peace.
I would give it about 2 stars out of 5 (I know I'm old school).
by Mike T. Jorgensen
∞ Friday, March 6th, 2009
@Mike: the ending of the book is pretty close (the movie removed a giant Squid that attacked NYC, convincing the world that aliens or weird creatures were attacking earth, and thus all had to band together to save humanity). I rather thought this adaption was less comic-y.
I actually loved the ending of The Dark Knight; and saw it more as a comment about people's capacity to tolerate the actual truth of what is happening in the world (a reflection of our current times; the people that are able to change outcomes are unpopular because they don't what is "PC", but what is necessary). Watchmen differed, in my opinion, in that there is still a sense of uselessness to it all (reflected through the actual "heroes"), the tone of the film wasn't one of hope. Though obviously the entire Dark Knight series (re-imagined by Frank Miller in the 90s) was influenced from Watchmen (and Miller has said as much).
I agree about the sex scene; it was a very short part of the novel, and the violence was altered (the novel had Rorschach setting the house on fire, as he gave the murdered a hacksaw to get himself free from the cuffs). And it was very Sin City like; just his style obviously.
by Paul
∞ Friday, March 6th, 2009
Went with a friend late last night. He called it 'masturbatory'. I have to agree. While I loved parts of it, on the whole, it was about 40 minutes too long. I think if they had cut out just half of the slow-motion punches and kicks they could have trimmed at least 20 minutes right there.
I didn't read the novel but I didn't find it difficult to follow either. Not sure why most reviews I read said it would be if I hadn't read the novel.
I'd go with 6/10 as well.
by westerndave
∞ Saturday, March 7th, 2009
i haven't read the Watchmen comic series, but i can't imagine them packing any more into one movie even if they wanted to, which is good for me, makes me feel like i got my money's worth
by coffee
∞ Saturday, March 14th, 2009